Hello Selkilassierose,
Bonnie waves to North of the Border :-)
I connect with your post and particularly those replies who highlight the relevance of a Crohn's diagnosis.
However, I do not know why, specifically, the ileorectal anastomosis has been put forward as a possible solution for you personally.
My observations would highlight the desirability of you knowing the true statistics and the actual definitions of possible complications - and my flag-up comes from a very positive person.
One may wonder why the term 'high risk' was used in the surgeon's letter to your GP [and why you were not copied into that letter].
Informed consent is very important, for then you are able to do all the research you need to in order to arrive at a carefully considered conclusion.
I cannot overemphasize the relevance of insisting upon a full disclosure - and a detailed disclosure to you as to what possibilities may arise - and for you to be informed in a clear, but detailed manner.
We can only ask the questions which occur to us.
And sometimes we are faced with selective data and not necessarily all possibilities that are already documented.
Please retain positive forward focus - for a good intention is very helpful - but take your time to research both before and after you have had your consultations - so that a reflection and careful sifting of the data allows you to be fully informed.
Crohn's disease is a genetic autoimmune condition which is still not fully understood - however, even if Crohn's is not actively affecting one, the immunity response of someone who has a Crohn's diagnosis cannot be minimized .... and that includes when we have no evidence of active Crohn's disease [either over a 'short' period of months or a very long period of many years].
Do not underestimate the existence of a Crohn's disease diagnosis:
A brief background which causes me to mention caution is that I had my panproctocolectomy when I was 25 years old - after a Crohn's disease diagnosis at 16 years: Although my colectomy involved the removal of part of the small bowel, all the large intestine and anus [i.e., everything past the point of incision of the small bowel] - there were many complications following that surgery which manifested physically elsewhere on my body - yet within the remaining digestive tract [from mouth to all of the remaining small intestine] there were no active symptoms of Crohn's after the colectomy.
Although Crohn's disease may be defined as quiescent [showing no signs of active symptoms - a state of being at rest] as I understand it - the fact is our differing genealogy does carry a very different [significant] propensity as regards how our individual autoimmunity system works and the manner that cellular responses work vary - and so each of our individual pathology is unique.
My Crohn's disease had been quiescent for many, many years - yet when I was accepted onto a clinical trial to receive the TIES device implantation - [self-elected surgery] in order to cease using a collection pouch - the resultant happenings were severely detrimental to say the least. Four and a half years on from TIES explant I am still in the process of reparative surgery and that has had the benefit of best-focused intention, and private surgery to try and address the unforeseen [by me] outcome!
Subsequent colorectal clinicians and consultant surgeons have expressed that owing to my Crohn's disease diagnosis that they personally would never have put me forward for the trial of the implant! I trusted the NHS lead investigator of the clinical trial who did put me forward!
I do not wish to alarm you - as the TIES device is a very, very 'new' journey in the field of potential continent solutions ... but my situation does illustrate the relevance of a Crohn's diagnosis and its implications.
... AND one positive element for the greater good of all Crohn's disease patients - going forward, the sponsor company of the clinical trial - within its FAQs say: "Patients in the clinical trial cannot have a Crohn's disease diagnosis".
The ileorectal anastomosis / J Pouch is far more well documented - and dependent on where you may elect to have the procedure - and by whom - the statistics will speak for themselves - but please make sure the statistics which are furnished for your contemplation refer to exclusively Crohn's patients and are not overall statistics for bowel surgery.
Ask many, many questions and try to research those questions prior to your consultation so that when the data is discussed you are able to ask pertinent in-depth questions upon that data; thereby you have a balanced informed presentation - remember 'high risk' has been communicated to your GP - which may be likely to be in connection with the Crohn's diagnosis.
The TIES concept is a great concept and time will tell whether that particular route to a continent solution proves to be acceptable for some requiring bowel surgery over time: I wish its development the best possible going forward.
I am a great believer in positive intention - and personally will only ever, very reluctantly, settle for second best - so do your homework and know we are rooting for you to come to a decision which is right for you: An ileorectal anastomosis may, or may not be the most appropriate solution for you?
Good luck
And best wishes
Jayne
PS I guess you may have come across this information, but if not, you may find this article and its citations helpful:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1425051/